Expert Criticizes Inadequate Risk Assessment for Dalston Block, Leading to Devastating Fire
In the wake of a devastating fire at a block of flats on Dalston Lane, concerns have been raised about the quality of the Fire Risk Assessment (FRA) conducted at the property. Independent fire expert Arnold Tarling has criticized the report as “careless and shoddy,” pointing to a lack of attention to detail and a failure to address critical safety issues.
Errors and Oversight in Risk Assessment
The FRA, filed in July 2023, failed to mention the presence of solar panels on the building and inaccurately stated that it was not possible to access the roof space for inspection. However, a video obtained by the Citizen revealed that contractors had been inside the roof to inspect a water tank months before the fire inspection took place. This oversight highlights a serious flaw in the assessment process and raises questions about the thoroughness of Peabody, the housing association responsible for the block.
Arnold Tarling emphasized the importance of inspecting the loft space to check for firebreaks, a key safety measure that was neglected in both the 2019 and 2023 reports. He criticized the culture of laziness and cut-and-paste mentality that seemed to permeate the assessment process, calling into question the competence of Peabody’s inspection system.
Residents Left Vulnerable
The inadequate risk assessment not only failed to identify critical safety issues but also disregarded the needs of residents living in the building. Many residents with mobility, hearing, and cognition impairments were not properly accounted for in the report, despite their significant vulnerabilities.
One resident, Neil, a disabled veteran and vulnerable adult, believes that the solar panels may have played a role in causing the fire. He expressed frustration with Peabody’s lack of communication and support in the aftermath of the incident, highlighting a pattern of neglect towards residents who are already facing significant challenges.
Elizabeth, a long-time resident of the building, shared her disappointment in Peabody’s response to the fire, noting the lack of outreach and support provided to those affected. She expressed feelings of abandonment and worthlessness, echoing the sentiments of many residents who have been left to navigate the aftermath of the fire on their own.
Peabody’s Response and Responsibility
Peabody has yet to provide a comprehensive response to the criticisms raised by Arnold Tarling and residents of the block. While they maintain that the 2023 FRA was valid and up-to-date, the discrepancies in the report and the lack of consideration for resident safety call into question the effectiveness of their inspection process.
Dame Meg Hillier, MP for Hackney South and Shoreditch, has been vocal in her concerns about Peabody’s handling of the situation. She emphasized the importance of supporting residents and ensuring that they are kept informed and provided with the necessary resources to navigate the challenges they are facing.
During a meeting with residents following the fire, Tracy Packer, Peabody’s managing director in north-east London, acknowledged the financial distress that many residents were experiencing due to the fire. She expressed regret that the support provided by Peabody had not been sufficient and pledged to do better in meeting the needs of all residents affected by the incident.
As the official investigation into the cause of the fire continues, it is essential that Peabody takes responsibility for their role in the inadequate risk assessment and the subsequent impact on residents. Moving forward, a renewed focus on resident safety and support is crucial to rebuilding trust and ensuring the well-being of those affected by this tragic event.